You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean scores, standard deviations, and BASIS impact for outcomes at each timepoint

From: The influence of a blended, theoretically-informed pre-implementation strategy on school-based clinician implementation of an evidence-based trauma intervention

Measures Condition n Baseline Post Follow-up Baseline to post regression Post to FU Regression
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Beta 95% CI Beta 95% CI
Attitudes toward EBPs (EBPAS)
 Requirement BASIS 11 8.85 2.40 9.45 2.81 9.89 1.17 .106 − .211, .423 .396 − .010, .802
Attention 13 9.69 1.65 9.54 2.26 7.31 4.39
 Appeal BASIS 11 12.74 3.35 14.18 1.78 13.33 2.18 .489 .158, .820 − .026 − .379, .327
Attention 13 13.54 1.94 12.08 2.72 12.00 3.06
 Openness BASIS 11 11.76 2.20 13.73 1.74 12.22 1.72 .488 .174, .802 − .121 − .405, .163
Attention 13 13.00 2.48 12.00 2.83 11.62 3.15
 Divergence BASIS 11 12.53 1.85 12.27 2.37 13.00 2.18 − .105 − .517, .307 .481 .261, .701
Attention 13 13.31 1.44 13.00 1.83 12.08 1.38
 Fit BASIS 11 23.03 3.76 24.18 2.93 22.56 3.88 .473 .180, .766 .191 − .271, .653
Attention 13 22.31 3.84 19.77 4.51 19.31 3.99
 Burden BASIS 11 10.70 2.45 10.18 3.46 9.11 3.95 .277 − .143, .697 .074 − .361, .509
Attention 13 11.08 2.25 8.62 3.97 7.92 3.48
Social norms
 Injunctive norms BASIS 11 0.90 1.14 1.36 1.04 0.81 1.48 .309 .721, − .103 .357 .102, − .817
Attention 13 1.00 0.82 0.81 0.75 1.42 0.62
 Descriptive norms BASIS 11 1.11 1.26 1.45 0.76 0.64 0.90 .474 .859, .089 .348 .102, − .798
Attention 13 1.21 0.89 0.60 1.04 0.69 0.90
 Self-efficacy BASIS 9 35.11 6.07 35.44 4.28 31.78 5.45 .360 − .020, .740 − .297 − .667, .073
Attention 13 34.85 4.76 31.08 5.81 32.08 5.62
Implementation citizenship behaviors (ICBS)
 Helping others BASIS 11 2.73 0.65 2.55 1.11 2.15 1.26 .166 − .185, .517 − .082 − .424, .260
Attention 13 1.95 0.97 1.85 0.95 1.82 1.21
 Keeping informed BASIS 11 2.85 0.70 2.91 0.67 2.41 0.98 .102 − .163, .366 − .275 − .569, .020
Attention 13 2.51 1.18 2.49 1.22 2.64 1.13
 Taking initiative BASIS 11 3.11 0.65 2.86 0.81 2.44 1.16 .087 − .254, .428 − .271 − .493, −.050
Attention 13 2.60 0.90 2.48 0.89 2.58 0.98
 Advocacy BASIS 11 3.36 0.54 3.15 0.84 2.69 1.24 − .053 − .434, .327 − .218 − .439, .003
Attention 13 2.75 0.82 2.77 0.79 2.78 0.97
 Mean total BASIS 11 3.01 0.51 2.87 0.79 2.42 1.09 .066 − .244, .376 − .252 − .489, − .016
Attention 13 2.45 0.87 2.40 0.85 2.46 0.98
Intentions to implement CBITS BASIS 9 31.00 5.68 30.89 4.91 24.78 7.17 .339 .007, .671 − .154 − .597, .289
Attention 13 29.54 4.82 24.08 8.37 24.08 7.92
  1. Bolded betas represent significant effects. Regression models examine impact of condition, controlling for baseline score
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908