You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Stakeholders targeted by instruments

From: The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration Instrument Review Project: A methodology to promote rigorous evaluation

Domain Construct DirectorN(%) SupervisorN(%) ProviderN(%) ConsumerN(%) OtherN(%)
Implementation outcomes Acceptability 0 (0.00%) 1 (1.96%) 31 (60.78%) 16 (31.37%) 3 (5.88%)
Adoption 4 (16.67%) 5 (20.83%) 11 (45.83%) 2 (8.33%) 8 (33.33%)
Appropriateness 0 (0.00%) 1 (14.29%) 3 (42.86%) 1 (14.29%) 2 (28.57%)
  Feasibility 1 (7.14%) 1 (7.14%) 7 (50.00%) 6 (42.86%) 1 (7.14%)
  Penetration 0 (0.00%) 2 (40.00%) 1 (20.00%) 1 (20.00%) 1 (20.00%)
  Sustainability 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (44.44%) 2 (22.22%) 3 (33.33%)
Intervention characteristics Adaptability 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%)
Complexity 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 3 (75.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (25.00%)
Design quality and packaging 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Evidence strength and quality 0 (0.00%) 1 (20.00%) 3 (60.00%) 1 (20.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Intervention source 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Relative advantage 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (57.14%) 1 (14.29%) 3 (42.86%)
  Trialability 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (66.67%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (33.33%)
Outer setting Cosmopolitanism 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%)
  External policy and incentives 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Patient needs and resources 1 (33.33%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (66.67%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Peer pressure 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Inner setting Combined 1 (11.11%) 2 (22.22%) 5 (55.55%) 1 (11.11%) 1 (11.11%)
  Culture 2 (25.00%) 3 (37.50%) 5 (62.50%) 2 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Implementation climate 1 (6.67%) 10 (66.67%) 5 (33.33%) 4 (26.67%) 1 (6.67%)
    IC: tension for change 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    IC: Compatibility 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%)
    IC: Relative priority 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    IC: Organizational incentives and rewards 0 (0.00%) 2 (50.00%) 1 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (25.00%)
    IC: goals and feedback 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    IC: learning climate 0 (0.00%) 6 (42.86%) 1 (7.14%) 7 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Networks and communications 0(0.00%) 3 (25.00%) 4 (33.33%) 6 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Readiness for implementation 2 (10.53%) 0 (0.00%) 3 (15.79%) 5 (26.32%) 10 (52.63%)
    RI: leadership engagement 1(25.00%) 4 (100%) 2 (50.00%) 1 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    RI: available resources 0 (0.00%) 2 (100%) 1 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    RI: access to knowledge and information 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%)
  Structural characteristics 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (50.00%)
Characteristics of individuals Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention 1 (1.79%) 2 (3.57%) 40 (71.43%) 8 (14.29%) 7 (12.50%)
  Individual stage of change 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (66.67%) 1 (16.67%) 1 (16.67%)
  Individual identification with the organization (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 5 (83.33%) 1 (16.67%)
  Other personal attributes 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 8 (21.05%) 18 (47.37%) 12 (31.58%)
  Self-efficacy 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (50.00%) 1 (25.00%) 1 (25.00%)
Process Engaging 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    Engaging: opinion leaders 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 3 (100%)
    Engaging: formally appointed internal implementation leaders 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    Engaging: champions 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    Engaging: external change agents 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Executing 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Planning 0 (0.00%) 5 (17.86%) 5 (17.86%) 5 (17.86%) 17 (60.71%)
  Reflecting and evaluating 0 (0.00%) 2 (10.00%) 9 (45.00%) 1 (5.00%) 10 (50.00%)
Client outcomes Satisfaction 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (28.57%) 5 (35.71%) 6 (42.86%)
  1. “Other” represents general staff or researchers.
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908