You are viewing the site in preview mode
Skip to main content
|
Domain
|
Construct
|
Instruments per construct
|
Stage of dev.
|
Stage of dev.
|
Percentage of instruments with definition
|
Number of articles in packet
|
|---|
| | |
N
|
M
|
Mode
|
N(%)
|
M(SD)
|
|---|
|
Implementation outcomes
|
Acceptability
|
46
|
3.11
|
4
|
33 (71.74%)
|
4.41 (4.11)
|
|
Adoption
|
24
|
3.58
|
1
|
21 (87.50%)
|
1.58 (1.52)
|
|
Appropriateness
|
7
|
1.00
|
1
|
3 (42.86%)
|
1.29 (1.10)
|
|
Feasibility
|
14
|
1.00
|
1
|
6 (42.86%)
|
1.57 (1.46)
|
|
Penetration
|
5
|
2.40
|
1
|
5 (100%)
|
2.60 (2.08)
|
|
Sustainability
|
9
|
2.44
|
1
|
6 (66.67%)
|
1.67 (1.48)
|
|
Total
| |
105
| | |
74
| |
|
Average
| |
17.5
|
2.26
|
1
|
70.48%
|
2.19 (1.96)
|
|
Intervention characteristics
|
Adaptability
|
1
|
4.00
|
1, 2, 3, 4
|
1 (100%)
|
1.00 (1.00)
|
|
Complexity
|
4
|
3.50
|
1
|
3 (75.00%)
|
1.00 (0.75)
|
|
Design quality and packaging
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
|
Evidence strength and quality
|
4
|
1.75
|
1
|
3 (75.00%)
|
1.00 (0.75)
|
| |
Intervention source
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Relative advantage
|
7
|
2.43
|
1
|
5 (71.43%)
|
1.00 (0.71)
|
| |
Trialability
|
3
|
4.00
|
1, 6, 7, 8
|
2 (66.67%)
|
1.00 (0.67)
|
|
Total
| |
19
| | |
14
| |
|
Average
| |
2.71
|
2.24
|
1
|
73.68%
|
0.71 (0.55)
|
|
Outer setting
|
Cosmopolitanism
|
1
|
3.00
|
2, 6, 8
|
0 (0.00%)
|
4.00 (0.00)
|
| |
External policy and incentives
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Patient needs and resources
|
3
|
4.67
|
6
|
2 (66.67%)
|
1.00 (0.67)
|
| |
Peer pressure
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
|
Total
| |
4
| | |
2
| |
|
Average
| |
1
|
1.92
|
6
|
50.00%
|
1.25 (0.17)
|
|
Inner setting
|
Combined
|
9
|
4.44
|
1
|
8 (88.89%)
|
9.22 (8.20)
|
| |
Culture
|
10
|
5.00
|
1
|
10 (100%)
|
4.44 (3.95)
|
| |
Implementation climate (IC)
|
15
|
5.60
|
1
|
14 (93.33%)
|
6.93 (6.47)
|
| |
IC: tension for change
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
| |
IC: compatibility
|
1
|
8.00
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
|
1 (100%)
|
11.00 (0.00)
|
| |
IC: relative priority
|
1
|
2.00
|
1 and 6
|
1 (100%)
|
3.00 (0.00)
|
| |
IC: organizational incentives and rewards
|
4
|
5.75
|
1,6,7,8
|
4 (100%)
|
3.00 (2.25)
|
| |
IC: goals and feedback
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
| |
IC: learning climate
|
14
|
4.64
|
1
|
14 (100%)
|
9.29 (8.62)
|
| |
Networks and communications
|
11
|
4.36
|
1
|
9 (81.82%)
|
5.17 (4.40)
|
| |
Readiness for implementation (RI)
|
16
|
3.38
|
1
|
13 (81.25%)
|
2.74 (2.59)
|
| |
RI: leadership engagement
|
4
|
5.75
|
1, 6, 7, 8
|
4 (100%)
|
4.50 (3.38)
|
| |
RI: available resources
|
2
|
3.00
|
1, 6
|
2 (100%)
|
2.50 (1.25)
|
| |
RI: access to knowledge and information
|
1
|
8.00
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
|
1 (100%)
|
7.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Structural characteristics
|
2
|
3.50
|
1, 6
|
2 (100%)
|
7.50 (3.75)
|
|
Total
| |
90
| | |
83
| |
|
Average
| |
6.00
|
4.23
|
1
|
92.22%
|
5.09 (2.99)
|
|
Characteristics of individuals
|
Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention
|
52
|
3.84
|
2
|
31 (5.36%)
|
4.48 (4.40)
|
| |
Individual stage of change
|
6
|
2.83
|
1
|
5 (83.33%)
|
3.00 (2.50)
|
| |
Individual identification with the organization
|
4
|
3.50
|
1, 4
|
3 (16.67%)
|
2.83 (2.36)
|
| |
Other personal attributes
|
34
|
2.65
|
1
|
27 (5.26%)
|
3.89 (3.79)
|
| |
Self-Efficacy
|
4
|
3.75
|
1
|
4 (100%)
|
2.75 (2.06)
|
|
Total
| |
98
| | |
70
| |
|
Average
| |
19.6
|
3.31
|
2
|
71.43%
|
3.39 (3.02)
|
|
Process
|
Engaging
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
1.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Engaging: opinion leaders
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
5.67 (3.78)
|
| |
Engaging: formally appointed internal implementation leaders
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Engaging: champions
|
0
|
0.00
|
0
|
0 (0.00%)
|
0.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Engaging: external change agents
|
1
|
7.00
|
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8
|
1 (100%)
|
10.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Executing
|
1
|
5.00
|
1, 2, 6, 7, 8
|
1 (100%)
|
2.00 (0.00)
|
| |
Planning
|
21
|
2.14
|
1
|
13 (61.90%)
|
7.25 (6.99)
|
| |
Reflecting and evaluating
|
20
|
0.03
|
0
|
9 (45.00%)
|
2.70 (2.22)
|
|
Total
| |
54
| | |
24
| |
|
Average
| |
6.75
|
1.77
|
1
|
44.44%
|
3.58 (1.62)
|
|
Client outcomes
|
Satisfaction
|
10
|
2.80
|
1, 3, 4, 5
|
4 (40.00%)
|
4.43 (4.11)
|
- Stages of dev. means the stages of development through which the instrument passed based on an eight-stage coding system describe in the text. It is important to note that these stages are not necessarily linear, meaning that an instrument need not pass through stage one to enter stage two and so forth. Rather, instruments received a point for any of the stages the instrument passed through. Finally, these ratings are reflective of the instruments’ quality at its inception (i.e., based on its source article) and are not necessarily indicative of the instruments’ current psychometric strength.
